Norma Najarro Dario Villar v. Brian Hill, Ca State Automobile Association

Good Law
39 F.3d 1187·1994 WL 590058·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 37778
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 27, 199494-15887California227 words

Opinion

Opinion

39 F.3d 1187 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Norma NAJARRO; Dario Villar, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Brian HILL, CA State Automobile Association, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-15887. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 17, 1994. * Decided Oct. 27, 1994. Before: BROWNING, FARRIS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Dario Campos Villar appeals the district court's 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915 (d) sua sponte dismissal for lack of jurisdiction of his action alleging various causes of action against his auto insurer, California State Automobile Association, with respect to damage to Villar's auto and possible personal injuries. The parties are both California residents, therefore, there is no diversity jurisdiction. In addition the parties are private parties and not state actors. The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Villar's complaint for lack of federal jurisdiction. Denton v. Hernandez, 112 S.Ct. 1728, 1734…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.