Gossage v. Oldenkamp

Good Law
39 F.3d 1187·1994 WL 594708·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 37787
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 31, 199494-35429California1,066 words

Opinion

Opinion

39 F.3d 1187 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Henry GOSSAGE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dr. OLDENKAMP, individually and in her official capacity as Contracted Dermatologist; Richard Graybeal, individually and in his official capacity as Health Care Manager of Twin Rivers Correction Center, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35429. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 17, 1994. * Decided Oct. 31, 1994. Before: BROWNING, FARRIS and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Henry Gossage, a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for Dr. Susan Oldenkamp, James Spalding, James Russell, Ruben Cedeno, Janet Barbour, Dennis Thaut, Richard Graybeal and Noel Lareau ("defendants") in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 civil rights action. Gossage alleged that defendants violated his Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights by failing to prescribe ultra-violet ("UV") light therapy for his psoriasis skin condition.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.