Edward Glaser v. City of Bell Gardens Bell Gardens Police Department Los Angeles County Sharon McCall Valerie Earley

39 F.3d 1187 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Edward GLASER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF BELL GARDENS; Bell Gardens Police Department; Los Angeles County; Sharon McCall; Valerie Earley, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-55473. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1994. * Decided Oct. 31, 1994. Before: TANG, PREGERSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Edward Glaser appeals pro se the district court's dismissal without prejudice of his lawsuit alleging civil rights violations against the City of Bell Gardens, the County of Los Angeles, various City and County officials, and others. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we vacate and remand. 3 As an initial matter, we reject the defendants' argument challenging our jurisdiction over this appeal. The district court's order clearly indicates that the court intended to dismiss Glaser's entire action without extending the time for service of process.…