William P. Lindo, Jr. v. City and County of San Francisco, Department of Social Services the Civil Service Commission

39 F.3d 1187 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. William P. LINDO, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Department of Social Services; the Civil Service Commission, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15335. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 17, 1994. * Decided Oct. 31, 1994. Before: BROWNING, FARRIS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 William P. Lindo Jr. appeals pro se the district court's denial of his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion to set aside the judgment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 * Background 4 Lindo's underlying action arose from Lindo's employment in the late 1970s and his subsequent discrimination suit against the City of San Francisco ("City"). Lindo asserted that because of his race he had been forced to resign with the status of "services unsatisfactory." Lindo and the City subsequently entered into a stipulated dismissal of that action in October…