San Francisco Web Pressmen and Platemakers' Union No. 4, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. San Francisco Newspaper Agency, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee

39 F.3d 1188 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. SAN FRANCISCO WEB PRESSMEN AND PLATEMAKERS' UNION NO. 4, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. SAN FRANCISCO NEWSPAPER AGENCY, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee. Nos. 93-15655, 93-15738. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 7, 1994. * Decided Oct. 25, 1994. Before: GOODWIN, O'SCANNLAIN, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 The San Francisco Newspaper Agency ("Agency") appeals the district court's order compelling it to arbitrate with the San Francisco Web Pressmen and Platemakers' Union ("Union"). On cross-appeal, the Union appeals the district court's order denying attorney's fees incurred at trial. We affirm. 3 * The Agency contends that the Union failed to comply with the procedural prerequisites that condition the parties' duty to arbitrate. Because questions of procedural compliance must be determined by an arbitrator, the Agency concludes, the court must dismiss the…