Gregory Patterson v. G.H. Baldwin Frank Hall M. Tangney P. Anderson D.R. Irwin

39 F.3d 1188 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Gregory PATTERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. G.H. BALDWIN; Frank Hall; M. Tangney; P. Anderson; D.R. Irwin, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35018. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 17, 1994. * Decided Oct. 31, 1994. Before: BROWNING, FARRIS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Gregory Patterson, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of the defendants in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. Patterson contends that prison officials (1) violated his right to equal protection when they placed him in administrative segregation, (2) illegally denied him outdoor exercise during the time he was in segregation, (3) illegally opened his mail outside of his presence, and (4) lost his legal mail. Patterson also contends the district court erred by denying his motion to strike the defendants' summary judgment motion. We have jurisdiction pursuant to…