Rashidi v. Albright

39 F.3d 1188 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Manouchehr RASHIDI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harold G. ALBRIGHT, D. Roe and C. Roe, Natural Parents of Tim Roe, a minor child, and Nancy L. Parent, as Guardian Ad Litem for Tim Roe, Defendants. No. 93-15623. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 6, 1994. * Decided Oct. 31, 1994. 1 Before: PREGERSON, WIGGINS, Circuit Judges, and FONG, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Manouchehr Rashidi, a former Montessori school employee, appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment for Defendants, Tim Roe, a former student at the school, his parents D. and C. Roe, Harold Albright, Tim Roe's attorney, and Nancy Parent, Tim Roe's guardian ad litem, in Rashidi's diversity action. In that action, Rashidi alleged that two suits Defendants previously filed against him for willful misconduct and negligent supervision constituted malicious prosecution and abuse of process. The district court granted…