United States v. Raymond Stanton Murray

39 F.3d 1189 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymond Stanton MURRAY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50450. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 3, 1994. Decided Oct. 26, 1994. 1 Before: D.W. NELSON and NOONAN, Circuit Judges and KING, District Judge. * 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 On February 22, 1993, Raymond Stanton Murray pled guilty to a one count indictment of being a felon in possession of 25 or more firearms in violation 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922 (g)(1). Although the government contended that Murray possessed 58 firearms, the parties agreed that the number of guns would be established at sentencing. On May 3, 1993, Murray made a motion to substitute counsel, which the district court granted. On that same day, Murray also moved to withdraw his guilty plea to challenge the validity of his prior conviction. The district judge informed Murray that he was not going to act on the motion to…