United States v. Ronald Gobert
Opinion
Opinion
39 F.3d 1189 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald GOBERT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50708. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 3, 1994. * Decided Oct. 31, 1994. 1 Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, REINHARDT, Circuit Judge, and TANNER, ** District Judge. MEMORANDUM 2 Gobert appeals from his conviction and sentence for conspiracy to commit armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 371 , aiding and abetting the use of a firearm during a crime of violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 924 (c), 2, and possession of stolen travelers checks in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2113 (c). He argues that there is insufficient evidence to support the conspiracy and aiding and abetting convictions; that the jury was instructed improperly on the law of conspiracy; that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance in violation of the Sixth Amendment; and that he was erroneously sentenced…