United States v. Hilario Ortiz-Delgado

39 F.3d 1190 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hilario ORTIZ-DELGADO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-10750. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 6, 1994. * Decided Oct. 24, 1994. Before: GOODWIN, O'SCANNLAIN, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Hilario Ortiz-Delgado appeals his conviction for conspiracy to possess a controlled substance with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 846 and for possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. 841(a)(1). We affirm. 3 * Delgado contends that the evidence presented against him was insufficient to support his conspiracy conviction. In order to succeed, Delgado must show that after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, no rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. United States v.…