Glenn Wooden, Jay Chapman and David McEuen v. The County of Shasta

39 F.3d 1190 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Glenn WOODEN, Jay Chapman and David McEuen, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The COUNTY OF SHASTA, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-17049. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 15, 1994. Decided Oct. 21, 1994. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, No. CIV S-90-1003 EJG; Edward J. Garcia, District Judge, Presiding. E.D.Cal. AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART AND REMANDED. 1 Before: POOLE, CANBY and RYMER, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM * 3 Plaintiffs, pretrial detainees and sentenced inmates of the Shasta County jails ("plaintiffs"), appeal the dismissal of their 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 class action challenging conditions of their confinement. Plaintiffs contend that the district court (1) erred in granting summary judgment in favor of defendants, the County of Shasta and Sheriff Jim Pope ("the County"), on claims raised in the…