United States v. Ricardo Pepper Reyes

39 F.3d 1190 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricardo Pepper REYES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50165. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 17, 1994. * Decided Oct. 27, 1994. Appeal from the United States District Court, D.C. No. CR-93-1233-IEG; for the Southern District of California, Irma E. Gonzalez, District Judge, Presiding. S.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before: BROWNING, FARRIS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ricardo Pepper Reyes appeals his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines for his guilty plea conviction for importation of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 952 and 960. Reyes contends that the district court erred in refusing to grant him a four level reduction in his base offense level for being a minimal participant pursuant to U.S.S.G. Sec. 3B1.2. We review for clear error the district court's determination of whether a defendant qualifies for minimal…