United States v. Victor Edward Reeves

Good Law
39 F.3d 1190·1994 WL 603092·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 37889
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 2, 199493-50785California239 words

Opinion

Opinion

39 F.3d 1190 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Victor Edward REEVES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50785. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 16, 1994. Decided Nov. 2, 1994. Before: FEINBERG * SCHROEDER and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Appellant's previous state sentence was for "conduct not part of the instant offense," and was properly counted by the district court as a "prior sentence" under U.S.S.G. Sec. 4A1.2(a)(1). Appellant argues the sentence should not be treated separately because it would be considered a "related" offense under U.S.S.G. Sec. 4A1.2(a)(2), app. note 3. This argument is misplaced: The "related cases" provision of Sec. 4A1.2(a)(2) was not intended to define "conduct not a part of the instant offense," which is the only exception to considering a previous conviction a "prior sentence" under Sec. 4A1.2(a)(1). United States v. Garcia, 909…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.