United States v. Bruce Albert White

39 F.3d 1190 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bruce Albert WHITE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50706. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 4, 1994. * Decided Oct. 24, 1994. 1 Before: FLETCHER, FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges, and SEDWICK, District Judge ** . 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Bruce White appeals from the district court's denial of his motion to suppress and his motion for a continuance of his trial. He argues that the warrant permitting the search of his person was not supported by probable cause and that any fruits of that search should have been suppressed. He also argues that the district court committed error when it refused to give him a continuance in order to examine tapes that the government used as evidence in its rebuttal. We affirm. 4 1. White argues that the district court committed reversible error when it denied his motion to suppress. The district court denied his motion on…