Joseph S. Pritchett v. King County Barbara Linde, Individually and as Senior Deputy Prosecutor John Meske

40 F.3d 1246 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Joseph S. PRITCHETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. King COUNTY; Barbara Linde, individually and as Senior Deputy Prosecutor; John Meske, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35428. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 14, 1994. * Decided Nov. 21, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Joseph S. Pritchett appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment for the defendants in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. Pritchett contends the district court erred by (1) granting summary judgment for King County and Deputy Prosecutors Barbara Linde and John Meske, (2) denying his motion for additional discovery, and (3) striking his amended complaint. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and affirm. 3 * Summary Judgment A. Standard of Review 4 We review de novo a district court's grant of summary judgment. Alexander v. City &…