Gary Trudell v. Kathryn S. Bail Donna Larson

Good Law
40 F.3d 1246·1994 WL 654937·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 38375
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 21, 199494-35824California209 words

Opinion

Opinion

40 F.3d 1246 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Gary TRUDELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kathryn S. BAIL; Donna Larson; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35824. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 14, 1994. * Decided Nov. 21, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Gary Trudell, a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action for damages. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. The district court properly dismissed his action without prejudice because a judgment in Trudell's favor would "necessarily imply the invalidity of his conviction" and his conviction has not been invalidated. See Heck v. Humphrey, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 2372 (1994). 3 AFFIRMED. * The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4 ** This disposition…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.