Jones v. United Food & Commercial Workers Intern. Union

40 F.3d 1246 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Tommy JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, Dan McDonald, individually and in his capacity as an agent of United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 870, AFL-CIO; Safeway Stores, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15711. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 14, 1994. * Decided Nov. 21, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Tommy Jones appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 870 ("the Union") 1 in Jones' action alleging that the Union violated its duty of fair representation in violation of the National Labor Relations Act, ("NLRA"), 29 U.S.C. Sec. 185 . The district court held that Jones' action was barred by the six-month statute of limitations. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de…