Daniel T. Miller, and Marsha L. Miller v. United States of America United Air Lines, Inc.

Good Law
40 F.3d 1246·1994 WL 655864·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 38367
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 21, 199493-36007California268 words

Opinion

Opinion

40 F.3d 1246 74 A.F.T.R.2d 94 -7136 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Daniel T. MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Marsha L. Miller, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America; United Air Lines, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-36007. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 14, 1994. * Decided Nov. 21, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Our jurisdiction over this appeal was limited by a prior order of this court to the district court's October 7, 1993 order (1) clarifying its prior order imposing Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 sanctions, and (2) striking Daniel and Marsha Millers' post-judgment motions for failure to pay the sanctions. Nevertheless, Miller contends on appeal that (1) his action was improperly removed from state court, and (2) the district court lacked authority to impose Rule 11 sanctions. These issues are not properly before the court. Because Miller raises no claims regarding the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.