Frank L. Canez v. Laborers' International Union of North America, Local Union Number

Good Law
40 F.3d 1246
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 12, 199593-15653California2,683 words

Opinion

Opinion

40 F.3d 1246 150 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2960 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Frank L. CANEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LABORERS' INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA, Local Union Number et al., Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 93-15653, 93-15986. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 17, 1994. Decided Nov. 23, 1994. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing and Rejection of Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc June 12, 1995. Appeal from the United States District Court, for the District of Arizona, D.C. No. CV-90-01614-EHC; Earl H. Carroll, District Judge, Presiding. D.Ariz. AFFIRMED. Before: LAY, * PREGERSON, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Frank Canez appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment and costs in favor of appellees, Laborers' International Union of North America, et al. Canez claims that his free speech and due process rights under Section 101 of the Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (LMRDA), 29…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.