United States v. 39058 and 39060 E. Knieriem Road, Corbett, Multnomah County, Oregon

Good Law
40 F.3d 1247
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 6, 19941247California970 words

Opinion

Opinion

40 F.3d 1247 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 39058 AND 39060 E. KNIERIEM ROAD, CORBETT, MULTNOMAH COUNTY, OREGON, parcels of real property with buildings, appurtenances, and improvements, Defendant, Martin Hobart STANWOOD, Claimant-Appellant. No. 93-36150. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 4, 1994. * Decided Oct. 6, 1994. Before: BROWNING, FARRIS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Martin H. Stanwood appeals pro se the district court's denial of his second motion to reopen the civil in rem forfeiture action that resulted in the seizure and forfeiture of his property. Stanwood alleges that he never authorized his attorney to sign a settlement agreement which was the basis of the forfeiture. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. 3 A district court's decision on a motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) is reviewed for an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.