United States v. Emiro Gonzalez, AKA Emiro Gonzales

Good Law
40 F.3d 1247·1994 WL 654928·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 38363
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 21, 199494-50080California471 words

Opinion

Opinion

40 F.3d 1247 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Emiro GONZALEZ, aka Emiro Gonzales, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50080. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 14, 1994. * Decided Nov. 21, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Emiro Gonzalez appeals his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines imposed following his guilty plea to conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1) and 846. Gonzalez contends that the district court violated 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3553 (c)(1) by failing to state its reasons for imposing a sentence at a particular point within the applicable guidelines range. Because Gonzalez expressly waived his right to appeal, we dismiss. 3 Gonzalez's plea agreement included a waiver of appeal which stated in pertinent part: 4 ... [Y]ou knowingly and voluntarily waive your right to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.