Jose Virakitti v. Oregon Department of Corrections Frank Leslie Hall Joseph Diehl

40 F.3d 1247 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jose VIRAKITTI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Frank Leslie Hall; Joseph Diehl, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-35700. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 5, 1994. * Decided Nov. 21, 1994. Before: POOLE, BEEZER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jose Virakitti, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of the defendant prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 civil rights action. Virakitti contends that the defendants were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and review de novo. Hopkins v. Andaya, 958 F.2d 881, 884 (9th Cir.1992). We affirm. 3 A grant of summary judgment should be affirmed only if the evidence, read in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, demonstrates that there is no genuine issue as to any…