United States v. James Wayne McGeshick

Good Law
41 F.3d 419·94 Daily Journal DAR 15343·1994 WL 592973·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 30313·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8280
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 31, 199493-30395California804 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hug, J.

James Wayne McGeshick appeals his conviction for distributing cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a) and 859. He entered a conditional plea of guilty reserving the right to appeal the district court’s decision to give an instruction requiring the Government to prove that a “detectable” amount of cocaine was delivered, rather than McGeshick’s requested instruction requiring the Government to prove that a “measurable” amount of cocaine was delivered. The sole issue presented is whether the district court erred in refusing to issue MeGeshick’s requested jury instruction. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

I.

On February 15, 1993, McGeshick allegedly distributed a controlled substance to a minor near Fort Peck Indian Reservation, Montana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a) and 21 U.S.C. § 859 . A lab report on the Government’s evidence identified the substance as cocaine, but also indicated “[n]o sample weight obtainable.”

Before trial, the district court held a conference to resolve a dispute regarding the parties’ proposed jury instructions. McGesh-iek’s requested jury instruction provided:

McGeshick apparently based his instruction on Ninth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.