Bankr. L. Rep. P 76,210 in Re W. David Weston, Debtor. Richard N. Bigelow v. Herbert Stoltenberg

Good Law
41 F.3d 493·94 Daily Journal DAR 16788·1994 WL 663413·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 33349·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8991
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 29, 199493-16044California897 words

Opinion

Opinion

Trott, J.

OVERVIEW

Attorney Richard N. Bigelow appealed pro se to the district court an order of the bankruptcy court imposing sanctions on Bigelow and his clients Harold Masunaga and Yukio Ayabe based on their failure to appear at a scheduled deposition. The district court dismissed Bigelow’s appeal as untimely. Bige-low appeals, contending a motion for rehearing filed by Masunaga and Ayabe in the bankruptcy court tolled the time limitation for filing a notice of appeal. We agree, and reverse.

FACTS AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

This appeal arises from an adversary proceeding commenced in a Utah bankruptcy court. As part of the adversary action in that case, appellees Stoltenberg et al. noticed the deposition of non-parties Masunaga and Ayabe. At appellees’ request, subpoenas duces tecum were issued by the Hawaii bankruptcy court and served on Masunaga and Ayabe requiring them to appear with certain documents for oral deposition on February 10, 1992 in Honolulu, Hawaii. On February 10, Bigelow, acting as attorney to Masunaga and Ayabe, filed a motion with the Hawaii bankruptcy court to terminate discovery, and on Bigelow’s advice, Masunaga and Ayabe did not appear for the deposition. At a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.