Nicolas Izaguirre-Ramos v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

41 F.3d 1513 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Nicolas IZAGUIRRE-RAMOS, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 93-70222. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 7, 1994. * Decided Nov. 7, 1994. 1 Before: PREGERSON, WIGGINS, Circuit Judges; and FONG, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** INTRODUCTION 3 Petitioner, Nicolas Izaguirre-Ramos ("Ramos"), petitions for review of a decision by the Board of Immigrations Appeals ("BIA") denying him discretionary relief from deportation pursuant to section 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA"), 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1182 (c). We AFFIRM. BACKGROUND 4 Petitioner is a 35 year old native and citizen of Mexico. On November 27, 1987, his immigration status was adjusted to that of a lawful temporary resident under INA Sec. 210, 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1160 , as a special agricultural worker. Section 210 was part of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 ("IRCA"), which…