Rudyard Buenaluz Gao-Ay Rudyard Solano Gao-Ay Liza Jane Gao-Ay v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service

41 F.3d 1513 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Rudyard Buenaluz GAO-AY; Rudyard Solano Gao-Ay; Liza Jane Gao-Ay, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 93-70751. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 1, 1994. * Decided Nov. 10, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Rudyard B. Gao-Ay ("Gao-Ay Sr.") and his two children Liza Gao-Ay and Rudyard S. Gao-Ay ("Gao-Ay, Jr."), all natives and citizens of Philippines, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") summary dismissal of their appeal from an immigration judge's ("IJ") decision denying their applications for asylum and withholding of deportation. The BIA also denied Gao-Ay Jr.'s motion to reopen in which he sought to apply for suspension of deportation. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105a(a) and deny the petition for review. 3 * Background 4 At a…