Orlando Richardson v. Robert Borg

41 F.3d 1513 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Orlando RICHARDSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert BORG, et al., Respondents-Appellees. No. 94-55125. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 7, 1994. * Decided Nov. 9, 1994. 1 Before: D.W. NELSON, NORRIS, and BOGGS, ** Circuit Judges. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Orlando Richardson was convicted in 1988 of rape, rape with a foreign object, oral copulation and child endangering. The district court denied Richardson's petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. 4 On appeal, we find that the prosecution produced sufficient evidence to convict Richardson. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, a rational trier of fact could find the essential elements of these crimes beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 (1979). We also find that Richardson had sufficient notice of the charges against him. Although the information did not specify what foreign object he…