Marie Odile Lorrang v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

41 F.3d 1513 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Marie Odile LORRANG, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 93-70933. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 1, 1994. * Decided Nov. 10, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Marie Odile Lorrang, a native and citizen of France, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' (BIA) denial of her request for suspension of deportation pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1254 (a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105a(a), and we deny the petition. 3 Lorrang contends that the BIA erred by (1) failing to give equal weight to the three factors determining eligibility for suspension of deportation, (2) adopting and affirming the immigration judge's (IJ) decision which failed to consider her separation from friends in her community as a hardship factor, and (3) finding that Lorrang had not shown…