James H. Hudson v. Diana Albert B. Lockwood Ray Davalos

41 F.3d 1513 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. James H. HUDSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Diana ALBERT; B. Lockwood; Ray Davalos, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-17319. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 1, 1994. * Decided Nov. 10, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 James H. Hudson, a California prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motion for reconsideration of the grant of summary judgment in favor of Diana Albert, an apprentice plumber, and other employees of the California Training Facility (CTF) at Soledad. Hudson also appeals the district court's denial of his request for a preliminary injunction to prevent his transfer from Soledad. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 Hudson filed an action under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 seeking an injunction and damages relating to his exposure to asbestos at CTF Soledad on March 29,…