F.D.I.C. v. Molinaro

Good Law
41 F.3d 1513·1994 WL 622986·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 38983
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 9, 199493-55341California553 words

Opinion

Opinion

41 F.3d 1513 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John MOLINARO, Defendants, and Jan Y. Kurahara, a Professional Corporation; Michael T. Morrissey, a Professional Corporation; Real Parties in Interest-Appellants. No. 93-55341. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 3, 1994. * Decided Nov. 9, 1994. Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER, and FLETCHER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jan Y. Kurahara, a professional corporation, and Michael T. Morrissey, a professional corporation, appeal the district court's order holding each of them liable to the FDIC for unreasonable fees and costs which the district court had previously ordered to be paid by the law firm in which Kurahara and Morrissey were partners. We affirmed the district court's order against the partnership in a memorandum disposition filed February 8, 1993, in an earlier appeal, FDIC v. Molinaro, No. 91-56212 (9th Cir.), cert.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.