Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 Provides That Dispositions Other Than Opinions or Orders Designated for Publication Are Not Precedential and Should Not Be Cited Except When Relevant Under the Doctrines of Law of the Case, Res Judicata, or Collateral Estoppel. United States of America v. Richard Robert Farmer, United States of America v. Alberto Valencia Barragan, United States of America v. Alfredo Barragan

41 F.3d 1514 Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Robert FARMER, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alberto Valencia BARRAGAN, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfredo BARRAGAN, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-10517, 94-10129 and 94-10154. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 3, 1994. Decided Nov. 9, 1994. 1 Before: SCHROEDER and RYMER, Circuit Judges and DWYER, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Appellants Richard Farmer, Alberto Barragan, and Alfredo Barragan appeal their sentences under the Sentencing Guidelines for various drug trafficking offenses. In an earlier appeal, this court remanded their sentences for resentencing. The principal issue in all of their appeals is whether the district court, on remand, made adequate factual findings as to relevant conduct under United States Sentencing Guideline Sec.…