Takano-Towa Guam Co., Ltd. v. Mickey S. Cox

Good Law
41 F.3d 1514·1994 WL 630050·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 39019
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 10, 199493-15875California431 words

Opinion

Opinion

41 F.3d 1514 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. TAKANO-TOWA GUAM CO., LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mickey S. COX, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-15875. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 1, 1994. * Decided Nov. 10, 1994. Before: BROWNING, TROTT, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 A contract must be supported by consideration. See 18 G.C.A. Sec. 85102 (1992). Consideration is the product of a bargained-for exchange, Colorado Nat'l Bank of Denver v. Bohm, 286 F.2d 494, 496 (9th Cir.1961), consisting in either a benefit to the promisor or a detriment to the promisee, Twin City Fire Ins. Co. v. Philadelphia Life Ins. Co., 795 F.2d 1417, 1427 (9th Cir.1986). Like other essential elements of a contract, the consideration given in exchange for a promise must be specified with certainty. Cf. Jackson v. Grant, 890 F.2d 118, 120 (9th Cir.1989); Transamerica Equipment Leasing Corp. v. Union Bank, 426 F.2d 273, 274 (9th Cir.1970). For…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.