United States v. Juventino Diaz-Cano, United States of America v. Arturo Flores-Pacheco

41 F.3d 1514 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juventino DIAZ-CANO, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arturo FLORES-PACHECO, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-50462, 93-50633. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 12, 1994. Decided Nov. 9, 1994. Before: FEINBERG, * SCHROEDER, and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Appellants Juventino Diaz-Cano and Arturo Flores-Pacheco appeal after entering conditional guilty pleas. Each challenges the legality of a different automobile search. Appellant Pacheco pled guilty to money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1956 (a)(2)(A)(B)(i) and now appeals the district court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence found in a police search of his car's trunk. Appellant Cano pled guilty to conspiracy and possession with intent to distribute approximately 50 kilograms of cocaine in violation of 21…