United States v. Lynn Alan Holmes

Good Law
41 F.3d 1514·1994 WL 622992·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 39006
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 9, 199493-30414California697 words

Opinion

Opinion

41 F.3d 1514 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lynn Alan HOLMES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-30414. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 2, 1994. * Decided Nov. 9, 1994. 1 Before: FLETCHER, D.W. NELSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Lynn Alan Holmes appeals his conviction under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922 (g)(1) for being a felon in possession of a firearm. He contends that the district court erred in not allowing a period of at least thirty days between his arraignment on the superseding indictment and his trial, denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal, and imposing a four-level increase in the base offense level for using or possessing a firearm in connection with another felony. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 4 * Holmes argues the district court violated the Speedy Trial Act, 15 U.S.C. 3161(c)(2), by scheduling his trial less than thirty…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.