United States v. Gregory May & Associates

41 F.3d 1514 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GREGORY MAY & ASSOCIATES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-15972. , Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 15, 1994. * Decided Nov. 9, 1994. 1 Before: FARRIS and BEEZER, Circuit Judges, and MUECKE, District Court Judge. ** 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Appellant Gregory May & Associates ("GMA") appeals the United States District Court's decision to deny a request for a stay of enforcement of a subpoena issued by the Inspector General of the Department of Transportation in connection with an investigation of contracts between the DOT and GMA. The district court did not err and we affirm. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 4 This appeal involves whether the custodian of corporate records may resist a subpoena for such records on the grounds that the act of production would incriminate him in violation of the Fifth Amendment, and whether the production of the documents violates a…