United States v. David O. White

Good Law
41 F.3d 1515·1994 WL 651945·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 39027
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 18, 199494-10085California1,021 words

Opinion

Opinion

41 F.3d 1515 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David O. WHITE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10085. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 15, 1994. * Decided Nov. 18, 1994. Before: LAY, ** PREGERSON, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 David White appeals from the district court's order affirming his conviction before a magistrate judge for driving on a suspended or revoked license in violation of California Vehicle Code Sec. 14601.1(a) while on McClellan Air Force Base. We affirm. 3 * Prosecution of the crime of driving on a suspended or revoked license requires the government to prove: (1) at the time defendant was driving, his license was suspended or revoked, and (2) defendant knew his license was suspended or revoked. In re Stocker, 257 Cal.App.2d 613, 617 (1968). 4 In order to show that White's license had been suspended indefinitely under California Vehicle Code Sec.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.