United States v. David Webb

41 F.3d 1515 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David WEBB, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10087. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 4, 1994. Decided Nov. 18, 1994. Before: SKOPIL, SCHROEDER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Appellant David Webb appeals his conviction after jury trial for conspiracy to defraud the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 371 , and for bribery in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 201 (c). The charges grew out of his activities in the Philippines which also led to a court martial proceeding. 3 Webb's principal contentions on appeal are that he was denied both his Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial and his statutory right to a speedy trial by the six and one-half year delay that occurred between the indictment and trial. We review the constitutional claim by looking at the factors as set forth in Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 530-32…