Thurmon Young v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company, a Corporation

Good Law
41 F.3d 1515·1994 WL 630100·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 39029
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 10, 199494-35215California294 words

Opinion

Opinion

41 F.3d 1515 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Thurmon YOUNG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY, a corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-35215. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 1, 1994. * Decided Nov. 10, 1994. Before: WRIGHT, BEEZER and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Thurman Young sued his employer, Burlington Northern, under the Federal Employers' Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. Secs. 51-60 . He appeals pro se a judgment for the defendant. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. 3 Young claimed that Burlington negligently caused or aggravated his lower back injury. The jury found Burlington not negligent. On appeal, Young says only that "[t]he issues [sic] I am raising on appeal is that it was not a personal injury it was a [sic] aggravation injury." But testimony, his attorney's argument and the jury instructions all addressed aggravation. He does not assign error to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.