United States v. Begay

Good Law
42 F.3d 486·94 Daily Journal DAR 15718·41 Fed. R. Serv. 434·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 30933·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8501
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 7, 199493-10165California9,862 words

Opinion

Opinion

42 F.3d 486 41 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 434 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Nez BEGAY, Donald Benally, Paul Kinlicheenie, Earl Roy Lee, Peter MacDonald, Sr., Ned M. McKensley, Alfred Scott, Sr., Anna Sorrell, Evangeline Begay Wauneka, Kee Ike Yazzie, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 93-10165, 93-10167 to 93-10175. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 4, 1994. Decided Nov. 7, 1994. Jess A. Lorono, Phoenix, AZ, for defendant-appellant, John Nez Begay. David M. Ochoa, Phoenix, AZ, for defendant-appellant, Donald Benally. David L. Titterington, Asst. Federal Public Defender, Phoenix, AZ, for defendant-appellant, Paul Kinlicheenie. Dana Carpenter, Phoenix, AZ, for defendant-appellant, Earl Roy Lee. Bruce S. Griffin, Aspey, Watkins & Diesel, Flagstaff, AZ, for defendant-appellant, Peter MacDonald, Sr. Douglas M. McVay, Phoenix, AZ, for defendant-appellant, Ned M. McKensley. Michael Morales, Phoenix, AZ, for defendant-appellant, Alfred Scott, Sr. C. Kenneth Ray, Jr., Phoenix, AZ, for defendant-appellant, Anna Sorrell. George F. Klink, Phoenix, AZ, for defendant-appellant, Evangeline Begay Wauneka. Stephen I. Leshner, Van O'Steen and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.