Coeur D'alene Tribe Of Idaho v. State Of Idaho

Good Law
42 F.3d 1244·94 Daily Journal DAR 17341·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34344·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9367
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 9, 199492-36703California7,824 words

Opinion

Opinion

42 F.3d 1244 COEUR D'ALENE TRIBE OF IDAHO, in its own right and as the beneficially interested party subject to the trusteeship of the United States of America; Ernest L. Stensgar; Lawrence Aripa; Margaret Jose; Domnick Curley; Al Garrick; Norma Peone; Henry Sijohn, individually, in their official capacity and on behalf of all enrolled members of the Coeur D'Alene Tribe of Idaho, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STATE OF IDAHO; Cecil D. Andrus, Governor; Pete Cenarrusa, Secretary of State; Larry Echohawk, Attorney General; J.D. Williams, Auditor; Jerry Evans, Superintendent of Public Instruction; Keith Higginson, Director, Dep't of Water Resources, each individually and in his official capacity; Idaho State Board of Land Commissioners; Idaho State Department of Water Resources, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-36703. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 2, 1994. Decided Dec. 9, 1994. Raymond C. Givens and Shannon D. Work, Givens & Funke, Coeur d'Alene, ID, for plaintiffs-appellants. Steven W. Strack, Deputy Atty. Gen., Boise, ID, for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho. Before: WRIGHT, REAVLEY, *…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.