Bel-Aire Ins. Co. v. Monden
Opinion
Opinion
42 F.3d 1398 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. BEL-AIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert MONDEN, Defendant, Mary Pio, individually and as Special Administrator of THE Estate of Olo Pio, deceased, and as Guardian Ad Litem of Sheena Pualani Pio a minor; and Fetufaai Lepetia, Defendant-Appellants. No. 93-15916. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 1, 1994. Decided Nov. 28, 1994. Before: BROWNING, TROTT, AND KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Mary Pio and Fetufaai Lepetia ("Appellants") appeal the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Bel-Aire Insurance Company ("Bel-Aire"). The district court concluded Appellants were not entitled to recovery under either the bodily liability coverage or the uninsured motorist coverage of the insurance policy issued by Bel-Aire. We affirm. 3 A grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo. Jesinger v. Nevada Fed. Credit Union, 24 F.3d 1127, 1130 (9th…