Robert Orien Buchanan v. Suzanne Lee Buchanan Thomas A. Gish Douglas Breck Marsh Lester H. Stewart

Good Law
42 F.3d 1398·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 39425
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 6, 199419-16336California2,302 words

Opinion

Opinion

42 F.3d 1398 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert Orien BUCHANAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Suzanne Lee BUCHANAN; Thomas A. Gish; Douglas Breck Marsh; Lester H. Stewart, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-36051. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 20, 1994. * Decided Dec. 6, 1994. Before: CHOY, SKOPIL, and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert Orien Buchanan, an Oklahoma resident, appeals pro se the district court's sua sponte dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Secs. 1983 , 1985 and 1986 actions. 3 * On August 24, 1993, Buchanan filed a complaint, alleging that the defendants 1 violated his constitutional and statutory rights during his state divorce and child custody proceedings. 4 On August 27, 1993, the district court entered a minute order, directing Buchanan to show cause as to why his claims against the various judges and commissioners of the Snohomish County Superior Court and Susan Bruland should not be dismissed on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.