BMMG, Inc. v. American Telecast Corp.

Good Law
42 F.3d 1398·1994 WL 678530·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 39423
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 1, 199493-55892California590 words

Opinion

Opinion

42 F.3d 1398 1995-1 Trade Cases P 70,858 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. BMMG, INC.; Robert S. Mann; Bob Mann's Malibu Gym, Inc.; Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AMERICAN TELECAST CORPORATION; Wally Armstrong Golf, Inc.; Wally Armstrong; Kenneth Rogers, aka Kenny Rogers; George Summerall, aka Pat Summerall; Defendants-Respondents. No. 93-55892. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 11, 1994. Decided Dec. 1, 1994. Before: GIBSON, * HUG, and POOLE, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 BMMG, Inc., Robert S. Mann, and Bob Mann's Malibu Gym, Inc., (collectively "BMMG") appeal the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of respondents. The dispositive issue on appeal is whether BMMG produced actual evidence of injury resulting from the respondents' alleged false advertising. See Harper House, Inc. v. Thomas Nelson, Inc., 889 F.2d 197, 210 (9th Cir.1989) (holding that actual evidence of some injury resulting from deception is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.