Chapman v. Bay Mun. Court

42 F.3d 1398 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Celeste CHAPMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BAY MUNICIPAL COURT; Contra Costa County; Honorable Harlan G. Grossman; Honorable Garrett J. Grant; American Housing Property Management Co.; Dinesh Sawhney; Verner Mix; Atil Madan, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-15710. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 18, 1994. * Decided Nov. 22, 1994. 1 Before: ALARCON and HALL, Circuit Judges, and KING, District Judge. ** 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Celeste Chapman appeals from an order of the district court lifting a preliminary injunction and dismissing without prejudice an action which she brought alleging violations of 42 U.S.C. Secs. 1981 , 1982, 1983, 1985, and 1986, and the First, Fourth, Fifth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. 4 Chapman's landlord, defendants American Housing Property Management Co., Dinesh Sawhney, Verner Mix, and Atil Madan (hereinafter referred to…