Nick Lawrence Cali v. John Hallahan

Good Law
42 F.3d 1398·1994 WL 650128·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 39416
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 11, 199494-15790California990 words

Opinion

Opinion

42 F.3d 1398 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Nick Lawrence CALI, Petitioner-Appellant, v. John HALLAHAN, Respondent-Appellee. No. 94-15790. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 4, 1994. * Decided Oct. 11, 1994. Before: BROWNING, FARRIS and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Nick Lawrence Cali, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 habeas petition challenging his state convictions for theft and burglary. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253 , and we review de novo. Robbins v. Christianson, 904 F.2d 492, 494 (9th Cir.1990). We affirm. A. Background 3 In 1984, Cali was charged with theft and burglary in case nos. CR-11781 and CR-12284 respectively. Pursuant to a plea agreement, Cali pleaded guilty to these two counts in exchange for the state dropping several other outstanding charges against him. Cali was sentenced to consecutive probationary terms, four years…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.