Samuel Andrisani v. G. Keith Wiscot, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Robert R. Devich Vaino Spencer, Justice Miriam A. Vogel, State of California Judge

42 F.3d 1398 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Samuel ANDRISANI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. G. Keith WISCOT, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge; Robert R. Devich; Vaino Spencer, Justice; Miriam A. Vogel, State of California Judge, et. al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-55282. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 20, 1994. * Decided Dec. 6, 1994. Before: CHOY, SKOPIL, and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Samuel Andrisani appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Andrisani contends the district court had original jurisdiction over his civil rights action. We affirm the district court's judgment. 3 We review the existence of subject matter jurisdiction de novo. Allah v. Superior Court, 871 F.2d 887, 890 (9th Cir.1989). 4 Following an adverse state court judgment in a malicious prosecution suit, Andrisani appealed to the state appellate court. The…