Forest Conservation Council v. Espy

42 F.3d 1399 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. FOREST CONSERVATION COUNCIL; Idaho Sportsmen Coalition; Idaho Wildlife Federation; Howard Buettgenbach, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Mike ESPY, Secretary of Agriculture; Ronald H. Brown, Secretary of Commerce; U.S. Forest Service; National Marine Fisheries Service, Defendants-Appellees, and Boise Cascade Corporation; Mountain States Legal Foundation, a nonprofit Colorado corporation on behalf of its members, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees. No. 94-35110. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 1, 1994. Decided Nov. 25, 1994. Before: WRIGHT, BEEZER and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 The Forest Conservation Council and others challenge the United States Forest Service decision to reconstruct, pave and partially relocate the South Fork Salmon River Road (SFSR Road). The district court dismissed the action on summary judgment. Forest Conservation Council v. Espy, 835…