Paul Gulbenkian v. T.Y. Lin International

42 F.3d 1399 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Paul GULBENKIAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-17247. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 14, 1994. * Decided Nov. 22, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Paul Gulbenkian appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his action under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Gulbenkian alleged that defendant denied him employment, violating the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 12101 et seq. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo, Buckey v. County of Los Angeles, 968 F.2d 791, 794 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 599 , 600 (1992), and affirm. 3 Our review is limited to the complaint's contents, taking the allegations of material facts as true and construing them in the light most favorable to the…