Ernest v. Gonzales v. Tom Agnos, Sheriff, Maricopa County

42 F.3d 1399 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ernest V. GONZALES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tom AGNOS, Sheriff, Maricopa County, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-17368. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 1, 1994. * Decided Nov. 4, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ernest V. Gonzales, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action against the Maricopa County sheriff. Gonzales contends the district court erred by (1) finding no constitutional violation after jail officials deprived Gonzales of legal materials; (2) failing to sanction the defendant for discovery violations; (3) denying Gonzales' motion to amend; and (4) granting summary judgment without resolving his remaining discovery motions. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo the district court's summary judgment, Sanchez v. Vild,…