Samuel A. Fordjour v. City & County of San Francisco

42 F.3d 1399 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Samuel A. FORDJOUR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-15872. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 14, 1994. * Decided Nov. 21, 1994. 1 Before: ALARCON, HALL, Circuit Judges, and KING. ** 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Samuel Fordjour appeals pro se from the order denying his request for an attorney to represent him in this civil action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915 (d) and the dismissal of his action as a discovery sanction, pursuant to Rules 16(f) and 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. We affirm. I. 4 In his brief, Fordjour contends the district court erred by denying his motion that the district court request an attorney to represent him. Fordjour further states that the district court had "no good reason" to dismiss his action. Fordjour, however, has failed to present argument in support of his contentions. 5 The Federal Rules of…